Shipwrecks in the Light of the Law – Who Has Rights to Them and What Are the Risks? 

Shipwrecks have long fascinated maritime enthusiasts and divers alike. For some, they are a valuable cultural heritage, while for others, they are attractive tourist destinations or potential sources of financial gain. 

However, behind every wreck lies a complex legal question: who holds rights to the wreck, what obligations arise from discovering it, and what risks may be associated with its exploration? 

What does the law say 

Regulations regarding shipwrecks can be found in several legal acts, both at the international and domestic levels. Key regulations include: 

  • UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001)

This convention establishes rules for the protection of shipwrecks that are at least 100 years old. The main goal is to prevent looting of wrecks and protect their historical value. Poland ratified this convention, meaning it applies to wrecks found in Polish territorial waters. 

  • United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 

UNCLOS governs the rights to shipwrecks in the high seas and in exclusive economic zones. In the case of wrecks of significant historical or cultural value, a state may claim rights to protect or conserve these objects. 

  • Polish national regulations 

Shipwrecks found in Polish waters are also subject to the Act on the Protection and the Care of Monuments and Maritime Law. A wreck recognized as a monument cannot be removed without the approval of the relevant heritage protection authorities. 

Who has the right to the wreck 

The right to a wreck depends on several factors: 

  • the age of the wreck and its status as a monument – wrecks older than 100 years are often treated as cultural heritage and are protected, regardless of their owner; 
  • the location of the wreck – if the wreck is located in territorial waters, it is subject to the laws of that state. In international waters, international regulations apply; 
  • ownership rights – if the ship’s owner still exists (e.g., the shipowner or their heirs), they may claim rights to the wreck. 

What are the obligations arising from wreck exploration 

Individuals or companies involved in wreck exploration must remember several key obligations: 

  • reporting the discovery – in Poland, the discovery of a shipwreck must be reported to the appropriate maritime office. Failing to report the discovery can lead to legal liability, including administrative penalties; 
  • obtaining permits – exploring and recovering a wreck requires obtaining the necessary permits, particularly if the wreck is considered a monument. Failure to obtain permits can result in the confiscation of recovered items and financial penalties; 
  • environmental protection – wreck exploration can involve the risk of water contamination (e.g., fuel leakage). Explorers are required to comply with environmental protection regulations. 

What are the legal and practical risks 

Wreck exploration carries risks such as: 

  • ownership disputes – in the case of a dispute over the rights to the wreck, the matter may be taken to court or international arbitration; 
  • accusations of looting – unlawful actions, such as removing objects from wrecks without permission, can lead to accusations of cultural heritage theft; 
  • liability for environmental damage – pollution of the marine environment during exploration can result in hefty fines. 

Conclusion 

Shipwrecks are not only fascinating objects of research and tourism but also sources of complex legal challenges. Understanding and complying with relevant regulations helps avoid conflicts and legal risks. If you plan to explore wrecks or face legal challenges related to them, it is worth consulting a law firm specializing in maritime law. 

Construction Contracts in Offshore Projects – Part II 

Offshore projects, due to their unique risks, require special protective mechanisms and clear settlement rules. Well-crafted provisions in these areas can make the difference between success and costly delays or legal issues. 

Therefore, in the second part of the article dedicated to construction contracts in offshore projects, we focus on the following aspects: 

  • safeguarding the interests of the parties,
  • the method of determining remuneration,
  • procedural rules in the event of force majeure.

Safeguards, payment and force majeure 

When signing a contract for an offshore construction project, both the investor and the contractor must think about securing the completion of the work, setting precise payment conditions, and preparing for unforeseen situations. After all, every project at sea is not only a business venture but also an art of risk management. 

Securing the investor’s interests – the “anchor” of stability 

Complex and costly offshore projects require strong safeguards that protect the investor in the event of the contractor failing to fulfill their obligations. The contract may provide for various forms of security, with the most common being a bank guarantee. This mechanism acts like an “anchor” – allowing the investor to cover the costs of potential repairs or delays without the need to allocate additional funds. 

Payments – staged remuneration and transparency 

Payment is not just a reward for completed work, but also a way to continuously monitor the progress. Staged remuneration works particularly well in offshore projects, where each phase carries significant costs and risks. The contract should stipulate payments upon the completion of each stage, and they should be contingent upon the fulfilment of specific conditions, such as providing progress reports. 

Force majeure – winds, waves, and other surprises 

The situation at sea changes rapidly – the progress of work can be influenced, for example, by weather conditions or other unforeseen events. This is why it is important to include a force majeure clause in the contract. This safeguard allows for the suspension of work in exceptional circumstances, such as storms or environmental hazards. With such a clause, neither party will be burdened with additional costs for situations beyond their control. 

Conclusion 

A construction contract in the offshore industry is more than just a standard agreement. It is an action plan, a set of safeguards, and a compass that guides both parties through the complexities of maritime project execution. Careful attention to every element of the contract can determine whether the investment succeeds and help avoid unnecessary legal complications.