Polboat Yachting Festival – Gdynia 2024

The 5th anniversary edition of the Polboat Yachting Festival organised in Gdynia by the Polish Chamber of Marine Industry and Water Sports – POLISH YACHTS is behind us.

The Polboat Fair is an event that attracts representatives of the yachting undustry, yach manufacturers and sailing enthusiasts. That is why – as every year – we could not miss it either.

From a legal perspective, it was four intensive and fruitful days of meeting – an excellent opportunity to exchange industry experience and knowledge, with our current and potential clients. Each conversation allowed us to better understand their needs and expectations.

Representatives of almost all major Polish manufacturers and dealers moored at the quays – from sailing yachts (of which there were slightly more this year than last) and motor yachts, through houseboats to jet skis.

Their premiers included:

  • Parker Poland – Parker 910 Odyssey,
  • Galeon Yachts – Galeon 435 GTO,
  • Dracan 42 (Dracan Marine),
  • Wiszniewski Yachts – W43,
  • Virtue Yachts – V10,
  • the impressive WAVE 60, a 60-foot catamaran by the Polish shipyard WAVE Catamarans, which impresses not only with its unique appearance but also with its functionality.

Also noteworthy were:

  • Catamaran Sunreef 80 (the festival’s flagship yacht),
  • 50-foot Cobrey-branded vessel,
  • Polish-produced VQ45 from Vanquish Yachts,
  • Delta 33 Coupe (Thodium Yachts),
  • Legion 360,
  • N ‘Fun 30,
  • Sea Ranger (Techno Marine),
  • produced in Poland – Saxdors and Windy.

We also accepted an invitation to the official fair talk (projected live on two telebims). The talk was hosted by the well-known journalist Stanisław Iwiński from the Yachtsmen.eu channel. Sandra Murawska and Małgorzata Wojtysiak talked about a very important topic in the industry – contractual clauses in shipbuilding and dealership contracts.

And on Friday evening, together with the staff of Pantaenius Poland, we co-organised an evening meeting for all exhibitors.

This year’s Polboat Yachting Festival, as always organised at an excellent level, showed once again that Poland’s leading role as a global yacht manufacturer is fully deserved.

We look forward to the next edition of the festival, hoping for equally inspiring talks and experiences.

See you next year!

Commercial sea fishing in Poland

Fishing at sea is strictly regulated by law. The formalities we need to fulfill depend on whether we intend to fish recreationally or commercially. Today, we will focus solely on commercial fishing.

The Baltic Sea is one of the most important fishing areas in Europe. Around 304,000 tons of fish are caught here annually, with over 90% consisting of herring, sprat and flatfish such as flounder. Nearly 6,000 registered fishing vessels operate in the region, which demonstrates the scale and significance of this sector.

When can commercial fishing be conducted

To conduct commercial fishing legally, it is essential to have the proper documents:

  • a fishing license,
  • a special fishing permit.

A fishing license is mandatory for all fishing vessels conducting commercial fishing in maritime waters. Without a license, legal fishing is simply not possible.

A special fishing permit is required when fishing for specific species or in areas where catch limits are set. This permit specifies the fishing conditions and includes:

  • catch quotas,
  • number of fishing days,
  • permitted fishing areas.

Who does not need these documents

Individuals fishing recreationally, for personal use, generally do not need a fishing license or a special fishing permit. However, it is always worth checking local regulations, as there may be additional requirements regarding equipment or fishing methods.

How to obtain a fishing license

To obtain a license, an application must be submitted with information about the vessel and the fishing equipment. The application for a fishing license should include:

  • details of the vessel (e.g. length, width, draft),
  • information about the vessel’s owner (name, address of residence or headquarters),
  • type and number of fishing tools that will be used,
  • the vessel’s fishing designation,
  • previous designations of the vessel if they have been assigned,
  • the IMO number, if assigned.

How to obtain a special fishing permit

The application for a special fishing permit must be submitted to the Chief Inspectorate of Marine Fishers by October 31st of the year preceding the year for which it is to be issued. The application should include, among other things:

  • vessel and owner data,
  • fish species to be caught,
  • requested catch quota or number of fishing days,
  • area of fishing,
  • type and number of fishing tools.

Consequences of not having permits

Penalties arise from non-compliance with regulations specified in fishing laws, such as the Marine Fishers Act. These regulations aim to protect fish resources and ensure sustainable fishing practices. The lack of required fishing license can result in a fine of up to 5,000 PLN, and the absence of a special fishing permit mat incur an additional fine of up to 3,000 PLN. Moreover, repeat violations can lead to fines up to 11 or 15 rimes the value of the caught fish.

The Chief Inspectorate of Marine Fishers and regional marine fisheries inspectorates conduct inspections to ensure that all vessels have the necessary licenses and permits.

Reflections

Having the appropriate documents not only protects against fines but also supports the sustainable development of fisheries. Legal fishing practices help protect marine resources and ensure their availability for future generations. Compliance with regulations contributes to the health of the marine ecosystem and the economic stability of the region.

Yachts, rubles and sanctions: how to avoid getting caught in financial trouble

Imagine you want to buy your dream yacht. Or maybe you are looking to sell one? It all seems simple, right? In reality, however, in the face of international sanctions imposed on Russia, this process can be full of pitfalls. Russia’s aggression against Ukraine has triggered a wave of restrictions aimed at complicating the lives of those attempting to bypass these bans. One of the key tools in the effort is obligation to check the sources of financing. How to avoid trouble? You will find out in this article.

International Sanctions in Response to Russian Aggression

After Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014, the international community, including the UN and the EU, imposed a series of sanctions aimed at weakening Russia’s economy and forcing it to withdraw from Ukraine. These sanctions were tightened after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Key legal acts include:

  • EU regulations, including AML (Anti-Money Laundering) directives,
  • Polish laws and regulations on countering money laundering and terrorism financing, as well as sanctions.

Sanctions have also affected the yacht market, particularly luxury yachts. Initially, supply chains suffered the most, but now the sale and purchase of yachts have become significantly more challenging.

The obligation to verify sources of financing

The obligation to verify sources of financing is not just a bureaucratic formality. It is the first line of defense against money laundering and the financing of terrorism. In the context of sanctions imposed on Russia, it aims to prevent individuals and entities linked to the Russian government from circumventing them.

Procedures and tools for verifying sources of financing

In practice, verifying the sources of financing includes:

  • identyfing and verifying the identity of customers,
  • monitoring transactions and conducting risk analysis,
  • reporting suspicious transactions to the relevant authorities.

Examples of measures to prevent sanction evasion in yacht purchases:

  1. Thorough verification of the buyer’s identity:
    • checking the identity of the individual or legal entity purchasing the yacht,
    • determining if the buyer is listed on sanction lists (e.g. EU or OFAC sanction list).
  2. Analysis of the origin of funds:
    • thoroughly checking the sources of financing for the yacht purchase, including analyzing cash flows and transaction history.
    • Providing documentation confirming the legal origin of the funds (e.g. bank documents, tax returns).
  3. Verification of ultimate beneficial owners:
    • identifying and verifying the real beneficiaries of the purchase to avoid situations where a sanctioned individual is hiding behind intermediaries or offshore comapnies,
    • applying the “Know Your Customer” (KYC) and “Know Your Customer’s Customer” (KYCC) principles.
  4. Monitoring unusual and high-value transactions:
    • increased vigilance regarding transactions that deviate from the norm or involve very high amounts,
    • using analytical tools to detect and report suspicious transactions.
  5. International cooperation and information exchange:
    • collaborating with international regulatory and law enforcement agencies to exchange information on potential sanction evasion attempts,
    • using international databases and financial information exchange platforms.

Consequences of non-compliance

Improper verification if financing sources can lead to serious legal and financial consequences, including:

  1. Administrative penalties, such as:
    • Financial fines,
    • Operational bans.
  2. Criminal consequences, such as:
    • criminal liability for individuals,
    • asset confiscation,
    • criminal liability for breaking sanctions.
  3. Other consequences, such as:
    • loss of reputation,
    • downgrading of credit ratings,
    • civil liability, primarily involving compensation claims.

The obligation to verify financing sources is a key element in enforcing sanctions imposed on Russia in response to its aggression against Ukraine. Companies and financial institutions must implement strict compliance procedures to prevent money laundering and sanctions evasion. Continuous education and procedure updates are essential, given the changing legal landscape.

A whistleblower is not an enemy: what companies can gain from the implementation of whistleblower protection laws

As early as 2021, EU law mandated the implementation of whistleblower protection regulations into Polish law. Three years later, in September, the appropriate regulations will finally come into effect.

The new obligations will impact approximately 32,000 companies and 16,000 public entities. In this article, we will explain who the new regulations affect, who qualifies as whistleblower, what their protection entails, and which entities must or can implement these procedures.

Who is whistleblower

The Whistleblower Protection Act, passed in June this year, will come into force on September 25, 2024. The new law aims to increase transparency and accountability in Polish companies. Importantly, it applies to both private and public sectors.

The Act defines a whistleblower as a natural person who reports or publicly discloses information about legal violations obtained in a work-related context.

This applies not only to full-time employees but also to temporary workers and individuals providing services under civil contracts, entrepreneurs, shareholders, members of legal entities’ boards, interns, volunteers, officials, and soldiers.

The adopted regulations aim to provide protection for these individuals if they report legal violations.

Who is required to implement internal reporting procedures

In Poland, the obligation to establish internal reporting procedures applies to private and public entities that employ or contract at least 50 people for paid work, as of January 1 or July 1 of a given year. Exempt from this obligation are organizational units of municipalities or counties with fewer than 10,000 residents.

The count of 50 people includes employees (converted into full-time equivalents) and individuals providing paid work under any contract other than employment.

Workplaces with fewer than 50 people performing paid work are not required to implement procedures, but it is worth considering.

The Act in practice

The new regulations require companies and institutions to create internal reporting channels. These are meant to facilitate the reporting of legal violations in verbal, written, or electronic form while ensuring the confidentiality of the identities of all parties involved.

Workplaces must also develop and implement detailed procedures for handling reports, specifying verification steps and corrective actions, as well as conduct regular training sessions for employees. The goal is to inform them of their rights, responsibilities, and mechanisms of protection against retaliation.

Additionally, the reporting system must be regularly monitored and updated to ensure its effectiveness and compliance with the law. This will help build trust and promote a culture of transparency and accountability within the organization.

Whistleblower under protection

Employees can report violations in three ways: through internal reporting channels established by private and public entities, external reporting to relevant state bodies (e.g., the Ombudsman), or through public disclosure.

Regardless of the chosen method, once a violation is disclosed, the employee is granted protection, provided there are reasonable grounds to believe that the reported or disclosed information is true and that it concerns a legal violation.

No retaliatory actions or attempts at such actions can be taken against the whistleblower. If the whistleblower is or was employed, or is expected to be employed, they cannot be discriminated against by refusal of employment, dismissal, reduction in pay, withholding promotion, demotion, mobbing, or any other form of discrimination.

Retaliatory actions also include attempts or threats of such actions. A whistleblower who falls victim to retaliation is entitled to compensation or redress.

On the other hand, a person harmed by knowingly false information reported by a whistleblower has the right to seek compensation or redress from the whistleblower for personal rights violations.

The consequences of failing to implement internal reporting procedures

The Act provides for the possibility of imposing a fine on employers if they fail to establish a reporting procedure or do so in violation of significant requirements.

In this context, the introduction of whistleblower protection laws may be seen by employers as an additional burden. However, it is worth viewing this revolutionary obligation from the perspective of the benefits it can bring to an organization.

Obtaining information about irregularities within the company allows for quick corrective action, avoiding legal and financial consequences, and protecting the company’s reputation.

Adapting companies to the new law

The ability to report violations through whistleblowers is highly valuable to comapnies. It is worth considering in workplaces with fewer than 50 employees as well.

Introducing whistleblower tools, even for businesses not required to do so, can prevent or limit the damage caused by violations, thanks to a quick response.

The new regulations also present an ideal opportunity to introduce other internal polices, such as codes of ethics or anti-mobbing procedures.

Although implementing the new laws may be challenging, it is worth analyzing all the pros and cons, and seeking professional assistance if necessary.